Have you ever considered at fact that every year millions of animals undergo painful death as result of scientific research? Because while most people think animal testing is necessary, others are upset by what they see as needless suffering. This essay outlines some of the arguments for and against animal testing.
First, let’s look at the arguments. One very positive point is that many medical treatments and procedures have been developed from such experiments. Since animal share many features with humans, scientists use animals to test the safety and effectiveness of newly developed drugs. Moreover, there is a large supply of animals. Some, such as mice and rats, have many babies, and there is no danger of extinction for these species. Finally, some advocates think that animals are less valuable than propel. If there is a mistake, it will not cost a human life.
However, there are also a number of arguments against animal testing. Perhaps the most important point is that animals may be suffering unnecessarily. Critics do not believe that every new drug needs to be tested on animals. Furthermore, some feel animal testing is ineffective; they point out that many drugs still have to be withdrawn from the market despite extensive testing. Last, some campaigners would like to see alternative used. They feel more human testing is possible and, too, that we could rely more on organ donors.
To conclude, I believe we need to ensure that animals used for experimental purpose do not suffer much pain. Although some animal testing may be unavoidable at present, treating our fellow creatures mercifully will demonstrate our humanity.
No comments:
Post a Comment